Verify the configured VLANs on the switches.Ī. In Part 1, you will configure trunk links among the switches, and you will configure VLAN 999 as the native VLAN. You will assign ports to VLANs and verify end-to-end connectivity with the same VLAN. You will also observe the VTP behavior when a switch is in VTP transparent mode. You will configure a VTP server and VTP clients in the same VTP domain. In this activity, you will configure trunk links between the switches. Trunk negotiation between network devices is managed by the Dynamic Trunking Protocol (DTP), and is automatically enabled on Catalyst 2960 and Catalyst 3560 switches. To ease some of the VLAN and trunking configurations, VLAN trunking protocol (VTP) allows a network administration to automate the management of VLANs. Part 2: Configure and Verify VTP Background / ScenarioĪs the number of switches in a network increases, the administration necessary to manage the VLANs and trunks can be challenging. Instructor Note: Red font color or gray highlights indicate text that appears in the instructor copy only. 2.Packet Tracer – Configure VLANs, VTP and DTP (Instructor Version).
VLT2 TASK3 WINDOWS
1.6K MCSA / MCSE on Windows 2012 General.So focus on learning and answering the tasks to pass. No matter how much effort you spend or brain cells you kill, a Pass will net you a 3.0 GPA in the end. What I do now is read the material to learn, google to understand more, then write enough for the tasks. I did it at first and it depressed me and led to wasted time. My advice: I found out that it doesn't pay to stress too much with these graders. Unless recently updated, there are tip sheets for all tasks. Look in the course chatter or course tips section.
VLT2 TASK3 ISO
i.e for Risk Management, it's section 5.2 of ISO 27002. If not, state it that a policy doesn't exist therefore such a section doesn't exist and post a justification. If it states that a policy exists, then justify the need for such a section. If it states that a policy exists, mark it and justify per ISO27002, if not, then say so.įor that question posted, find out from the risk assessment again. I really feel, WGU should look at MS ISA VLT2 course and their for originality scores. Turnitin itself is flawed it was flagging 82% originality score for my own wordings?!! If WGU is so perfect why having a 1997 technology (MS Access) in a course like this, checked by a flawed turnitin system?!! The tasks that were evaluated in 12-24 hours time which now takes 72 hours or more!! It seems like one of the strategies of WGU slowing down a student who is in accelerated the completion path. A total of 9-10 days were lost just by waiting to know the results whereas earlier almost all other papers were evaluated within 24 hours. I cannot assume anything other than monetary benefits for sending the tasks back without proper explanations creating unusual delays in evaluations and hindering progress forward. WGU it seems are making unethical ways to slow down a student from completing their tasks on time and completing their course!!! It looks like there is a deliberate attempt to find as many faults in a VLT2 tasks and trying to discourage students who spend hours, days and months to complete these tasks.
VLT2 TASK3 FULL
In 2015 trying to reason MS Access 97 on security course like this?!! Trying explain a dead technology after 18 years?!! Does anyone in WGU really care? Take a deep look at this course or is this just a filler course to make students struggle at the end? Internet blogs are full of bad reviews for this course by many students current and previous. The description of the scenario is very limited and students have to guess what technologies were to be used in a scenario and what documentations need to be used and referred!! The task requirement does not clearly mention what is expected for each task starting from task1 to task4. The course tasks that does not reflect any real world scenarios.
0 kommentar(er)
